Elsevier Author Services – Articles
  • Language Editing Services
  • Translation Services
  • Author’s Webshop
Facebook
Pinterest
LinkedIn
YouTube
WeChat
x
Elsevier Author Services – Articles
Language Editing Services by Elsevier Author Services
Elsevier Author Services – Articles
  • Research Process
  • Manuscript Preparation
  • Manuscript Review
  • Publication Process
  • Publication Recognition
  • English
Research Fraud: Falsification and Fabrication in Research Data
  • Manuscript Review

Research Fraud: Falsification and Fabrication in Research Data

  • 4 minute read
  • 30.7K views
Total
1
Shares
1
0
0
0
0

Table of Contents

  • What is the difference between falsification and fabrication?
  • How to Detect Fabricated Data
  • Image Manipulation in Research
  • Protecting Your Reputation
  • The Bottom Line

Although uncommon, it’s not unheard of that researchers are accused of falsifying and/or fabrication research. In addition to other malintent, like plagiarism, duplication in publishing or multiple submissions. The tricky part is finding and identifying true fraudulent activity, even through peer review processes. Even highly regarded journals have accepted articles that are suspected of research fraud. On the other hand, some researchers have had their careers and reputations compromised by false accusations. Even if the false accusation was cleared, intense media coverage on the accusation versus the acquittal can mean permanent damage to the researcher.

What is the difference between falsification and fabrication?

Any type of research fraud usually involves publishing conclusions, or even data, that were either made up or changed. There are two different types of research fraud; fabrication and falsification. Obviously, they are related. However, they are distinctly different.

Falsification essentially involves manipulating or changing data, research materials, processes, equipment and, of course, results. This can include altering data or results in a way where the research is not accurate. For example, a researcher might be looking for a particular outcome, and the actual research did not support their theory. They might manipulate the data or analysis to match the research to the desired results.

Fabrication, on the other hand, is more about making up research results and data, and reporting them as true. This can happen when a researcher, for example, states that a particular lab process was done when, in fact, it wasn’t. Or that the research didn’t take place at all, in the case of a study results from previous research were copied and published as original research.

Obviously, both falsification and fabrication of data and research are extremely serious forms of misconduct. Primarily because they can result in an inaccurate scientific record that does not reflect scientific truth. Additionally, research fraud deceives important stakeholders of the research, like sponsoring institutions, funders, employers, the readers of the research and the general public.

How to Detect Fabricated Data

Sometimes it’s easy to identify fraud and fabricated research. Maybe, for example, an evaluator of the research is aware that a particular lab doesn’t have the capability to conduct a particular form of research, contrary to the claims of the researcher. Or, data from the control experiment may be presented as too “perfect,” leading to suspicions of fabricated data.

Suspected data manipulation in research, fabrication or falsification is subject to reporting and investigation to determine if the intent was to commit fraud, or if it was a mistake or oversight. Most publishers have extremely strict policies about manipulation of images, as well as demanding access to the researcher’s data.

Image Manipulation in Research

Another fairly common fabrication relates to images that appear to have been manipulated. It should be noted that image enhancement is often acceptable, however any enhancement must relate to the actual data, and whatever image results from the enhancement must accurately represent the data. If an image is significantly manipulated, it must be disclosed in the figure caption and/or your “materials and methods” section of the manuscript.

So, the bottom line is that image manipulation in research is okay, as long as the manipulation is to improve clarity, no specific features are introduced, removed, moved, obscured or enhanced. Minor adjustments to brightness, color balance and contrast are acceptable if they don’t eliminate or obscure information that is present in the original image.

Protecting Your Reputation

A researcher’s worst nightmare might be the accusation of committing fraud. Of course, unintentional errors do happen, and unfortunately they can appear to be misconduct. However, it should be made clear that an honest error is not considered research misconduct.

To avoid any false accusations, make sure your research is 100% accurate and any methods and processes are expressed accurately. Ensure that any images that might be enhanced are noted as such, and include the original image with your submission. Keep records of all raw data; if falsification or fabrication are suspected, the journal or other investigative body will demand to review your information. Therefore, flawless records must be kept, analyzed and reported. Additionally, certain research topics, such as studies of human subjects, require a specific duration of data retention.

If you discover an accidental published error, follow the steps outlined in our article about retracting or withdrawing your research.

The Bottom Line

A researcher must take extra care to ensure that their data and research can not even be suspected of fraud via falsification and fabrication. You can do this by being transparent and honest about any and all research, data, analysis and conclusions. Remembering that the purpose of research is to further collective knowledge over supporting desired outcomes is key to ensuring integrity in research.

Language Editing Plus

Elsevier’s Language Editing Plus service includes unlimited rounds of language review for up to one year, manuscript formatting, reference checks, a customised cover letter and more.

Type in wordcount for Plus
Total:
Follow this link if your manuscript is longer than 9,000 words.
Upload
Total
1
Shares
Post 1
Tweet 0
Share 0
Send 0
Message 0
Previous Article
How to Network at an Academic Conference
  • Publication Recognition

How to Network at an Academic Conference

View Post
Next Article
Lay Summary: promote your work outside academia
  • Publication Recognition

Lay Summary: Promote Your Work Outside Academia

View Post
You May Also Like
Correct way writing p value statistical analyses
View Post
  • Manuscript Review

What is the correct way of writing the p value in statistical analyses?

Active and Passive Voices in Academic Writing
View Post
  • Manuscript Review

Using the Active and Passive Voices in Academic Writing

Avoid Accidental Plagiarism
View Post
  • Manuscript Review

Five Easy Ways to Avoid Accidental Plagiarism

View Post
  • Manuscript Review

Professor Anselmo Paiva: Using Computer Vision to Tackle Medical Issues with a Little Help from Elsevier Author Services

What is the main purpose of proofreading a paper?
View Post
  • Manuscript Review

What is the main purpose of proofreading a paper?

Systematic review vs meta-analysis
View Post
  • Manuscript Review

Systematic Review VS Meta-Analysis

Looking for Medical Editing Services - Elsevier
View Post
  • Manuscript Review

Looking for Medical Editing Services

Proofreading-or-editing
View Post
  • Manuscript Review

Proofreading or Editing?

  • managing-and-sharing-research-data

    Managing and Sharing Research Data

    • 4 minute read
    View Post
  • PowerPoint Presentation of Your Research Paper

    How to Make a PowerPoint Presentation of Your Research Paper

    • 4 minute read
    View Post
  • How-to-present-scientific-data

    How to Present Scientific Data

    • 3 minute read
    View Post
  • What is Observational Study Design and Types

    What is Observational Study Design and Types

    • 4 minute read
    View Post
  • Systematic Literature Review or Literature Review

    Systematic Literature Review or Literature Review?

    • 3 minute read
    View Post
More Posts
  • What is a predatory Journal
    Navigating the Complex Landscape of Predatory Journals
    • 3 minute read
  • Manuscript Submission
    From Pen to Press: Navigating the Manuscript Submission Process
    • 3 minute read
  • choosing the Right Research Methodology
    Choosing the Right Research Methodology: A Guide for Researchers
    • 3 minute read
  • Analytical Method Validation
    Navigating the Reproducibility Crisis: A Guide to Analytical Method Validation
    • 3 minute read
  • Why is data validation important in research
    Why is data validation important in research?
    • 3 minute read
  • how to write the results section of a research paper
    How to write the results section of a research paper
    • 3 minute read
Price Calculator
Type in wordcount for Standard
Total:
Follow this link if your manuscript is longer than 12,000 words.
Upload
Learn more about
  • Research Process
  • Manuscript Preparation
  • Manuscript Review
  • Publication Process
  • Publication Recognition
  • News
Elsevier Author Services – Articles
  • Language Editing Services
  • Translation Services
  • Author’s Webshop
Elsevier wordmark
Terms & Conditions

Cookies are used by this site. To decline or learn more, visit our Cookies page.

RELX Wordmark

Input your search keywords and press Enter.