Highlights Archives | Articles | Elsevier Author Services

Every study has its limitations, whether inherent to the sample chosen or the methods employed. However, researchers frequently encounter challenges in effectively articulating the limitations of their studies1. While the practice may seem counterproductive, communicating the limitations of a study can help inform the audience of the robustness of the findings and conclusions. Presenting the limitations effectively is a great way to communicate the study’s credibility to readers. In this article, we will discuss why it is advisable to clearly articulate the limitations of a study and how one can go about this task. Why You Must Describe Study Limitations Comprehensively Prevent criticism Thoroughly stating the limitations of your study reduces the risk of future external discoveries, safeguarding your credibility as a researcher2. Show understanding When you comprehensively list study limitations, you demonstrate a clear understanding of the study’s goals, leaving a positive impression on reviewers and readers and highlighting your expertise in the subject area2. Suggest improvements Describing limitations invites suggestions for improvement, enhancing study design for more robust findings and further advancing your field of research2. Things to Keep in Mind While Writing Limitations Identify the type(s) of limitation clearly Clearly state where in your study the limitations exist and identify the source of these limitations3. They may arise from study design, sampling, data collection, data analysis, or interpretation. Limitation in study design: “This study assessed psychological wellbeing post-hospitalization via online interviews, acknowledging potential downsides compared to in-person interviews.” Limitation in sampling: “Our sampling focused on urban areas, possibly overlooking valuable insights from rural populations, which could offer differing perspectives on the studied phenomenon.” Limitation in data collection: “A significantly higher number of insects were collected from quadrant four of the nature reserve, which may have introduced geographical biases in the data.” Limitation in data analysis: “Our multi factor analysis did not explore the relationship between education level of parents and individual net worth, although the factors might be related.” Limitation in study results: “Since our study looked at deterioration of steel implants cross-sectionally, longitudinal studies are required to confirm our findings.” Explain their impact on study findings Addressing limitations explains their impact on the findings, showcasing scientific rigor, and revealing broader implications. Example: “We used vehicle count and passenger capacity as proxies for commuters on Beijing’s national highway, which could have resulted in an overestimate of nearly 20–40%. This implies that more people could have stayed at home during holidays than our results suggest.” Detail steps to minimize impact Explain any action taken to lessen the impact of limitations3. Example: “Protein analysis of plant metabolites was performed in the field at suboptimal conditions. However, we used triplicates across samples to reduce any error.” Suggest future avoidance strategies Suggest ways to prevent the limitations in future studies3. As mentioned earlier, this can be a valuable contribution to your field of research and accelerate its growth. Example: “Our analysis reveals inaccuracies with mid-range LIDAR at 1000 m altitude. We recommend that future aerial surveys use mid-range LIDARs at 800 m or lower for improved accuracy.” Conclusion Researchers may hesitate to discuss the limitations of their study when writing a manuscript, thinking it may hinder journal acceptance chances or assuming that the reviewers and editors will handle this aspect. However, this cannot be farther from the truth. Clearly stating limitations improves your manuscript’s publication odds and establishes professional credibility in the long run. The editors at Elsevier Language Services help researchers overcome this challenge and present their research in a transparent and effective manner. When you work with ELS, our editors ensure that your writing reflects authenticity and credibility and that your manuscript stands the best chance of publication in the journal of your choice! References Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2007). Limitations are not properly acknowledged in the scientific literature. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(4), 324–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.09.011 Research guides: Organizing Academic research Papers: Limitations of the study. (n.d.). https://library.sacredheart.edu/c.php?g29803&p185934 Ross, P. T., & Zaidi, N. L. B. (2019). Limited by our limitations. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(4), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-00530-x

Highlight

Can Describing Study Limitations Improve the Quality of Your Paper?

If You’re a Researcher, Remember These Before You Are Submitting Your Manuscript to Journals!

A Guide to Crafting Shorter, Impactful Sentences in Academic Writing

Is The Use of AI in Manuscript Editing Feasible? Here’s Three Tips to Steer Clear of Potential Issues

6 Steps to Write an Excellent Discussion in Your Manuscript

Research Team Structure

Making Technical Writing in Environmental Engineering Accessible

How to Write the Results Section: Guide to Structure and Key Points

How to submit articles to Elsevier journals using LaTeX format

Submission 101: What format should be used for academic papers?

How to Write a Cover Letter for Your Manuscript? Here are the Tips and Examples

Page-Turner Articles are More Than Just Good Arguments: Be Mindful of Tone and Structure!

How to Ensure Inclusivity in Your Scientific Writing

Three Tips to Efficient Spellchecks | Elsevier